If you previously registered on VGF XenForo boards, you will need to use the forgot password feature in order to be able to post here. If you do not receive a password reset by e-mail, use the contact page or post in registration/login help.

Republican Lawmakers Balk At Trump’s Border Wall

Moderators: Deku Tree, I am nobody

Post Reply
User avatar
Bad Dragonite
Posts: 8649
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 7:24 pm
Location: Hetalia

Republican Lawmakers Balk At Trump’s Border Wall

Post by Bad Dragonite » Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:23 am

http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/04/repub ... ium=Social
Republican Lawmakers Balk At Trump’s Border Wall, Citing Exorbitant Costs And Futility
Image
Eric Owens
Education Editor

10:03 AM 02/04/2017


Over a dozen Republicans in Congress are expressing skepticism about President Donald Trump’s plan to construct an “impenetrable, physical, tall, powerful, beautiful, southern border wall” along the 1,954-mile-long border between the United States and Mexico.

Some of the GOP lawmakers say they will vote against any legislation funding a wall unless its potentially steep cost is wholly offset by cuts in spending elsewhere, reports CNN.

Other Republicans in Congress say that the wall, if built, will fail to stem the tide of illegal immigration from Mexico as well as Central America.

Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker counts himself among the legislators concerned about how any wall would be funded.

“I don’t want to see any spending, additional spending on anything done that is not paid for,” Corker told CNN. “We have got a huge fiscal problem right now — $20.355 trillion in debt projected to add $9.7 trillion over the next 10 years.”

Lamar Alexander, Tennessee’s other senator, expressed similar sentiments.

“Everything we spend we need to find a way to pay for,” Alexander told CNN.

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski is also concerned about the budgetary effect of any wall proposal.

“If you’re going to spend that kind of money, you’re going to have to show me where you’re going to get that money,” Murkowski told the news network.

Last week, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan estimated that a wall such as the one repeatedly promised by Trump would cost between $12 billion and $15 billion.

To put this dollar amount in perspective, it is roughly equal to the entire annual gross-domestic product of Jamaica.

Ryan said it’s possible that the cost of the proposed wall might not need to be entirely offset by spending cuts elsewhere because the wall is “a national security priority.”

Republicans who are concerned that a wall between the United States and Mexico will do little to stem the tide of illegal immigration include Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn of Texas and Sen. John McCain.

“I don’t think we’re just going to be able to solve border security with a physical barrier because people can come under, around it and through it,” Cornyn told CNN.

During his presidential campaign, Trump promised that work on a massive border wall would begin “on day one” of his administration.

“On day one, we will begin working on an impenetrable, physical, tall, powerful, beautiful southern border wall,” Trump said. “And Mexico will pay for the wall. They don’t know it yet, but they’re going to pay for the wall. And they’re great people and great leaders but they’re going to pay for the wall.”

Trump made the comments after meeting with Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto.

Two weeks into Trump’s presidential administration, skeptical Republican lawmakers say they don’t believe Trump will — or should — actually find a way to compel Mexico to pay the cost of the wall.

“I don’t count on Mexico to pay for our national security,” Oklahoma Sen. James Lankford told CNN. “It’s the responsibility of every nation to take care of their own security.”

In recent days, Trump has suggested that U.S. taxpayers will initially foot the bill for the wall. Then, at some undisclosed later date, Mexico will reimburse the United States for the costs.

Some Republicans don’t think Trump will be able to obtain such a reimbursement.

“It’s not a viable option,” John McCain told CNN.

Last week, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer floated the idea of a 20 percent tax on imports from Mexico in order to pay for the promised wall along the southern border of the U.S. (RELATED: Spicer Says Import Tax Still The ‘Best Plan’ For Funding Wall)

-----
JohnCornyn @JohnCornyn
Many unanswered questions about proposed "border adjustment" tax



Lindsey Graham @LindseyGrahamSC
Border security yes, tariffs no. Mexico is 3rd largest trading partner. Any tariff we can levy they can levy. Huge barrier to econ growth /1
--

Trump’s Homeland Security secretary, John Kelly, has been negotiating with GOP lawmakers this week about border security options. However, senators involved in the discussions have complained about a lack of concrete details.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2017/02/04/repub ... z4Xn0ibgrr
-Bow Chika Bow Wow
-Your offense only makes me stronger.

User avatar
е и ժ е я
Supermod
Posts: 40979
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
Contact:

Post by е и ժ е я » Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:01 am

The wall idea is so far removed from reality that nobody should be getting behind it. I still don't believe Trump has ever intended to make it happen and he's proposed the idea knowing it would need congressional approval to go forward. Just another ludicrous campaign promise never intended to get anywhere.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying

User avatar
CaptHayfever
Supermod
Posts: 36833
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 1:00 am
Location: (n) - the place where I am
Contact:

Post by CaptHayfever » Sun Feb 05, 2017 1:38 pm

lack of concrete details.
Heh, I see what they did there.

And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"

User avatar
X-3
Moderator
Posts: 22969
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:00 am
Location: noiɈɒɔo⅃

Post by X-3 » Sun Feb 05, 2017 3:16 pm

They'll approve of it anyway.

Post Reply

Return to “Politics, Philosophy, and Religion”